What is your Nokia N95 experience after a year?

Comments

[this is good]
I wanted... a small powerful computer in my pocket.

I got... a amazing (but slightly odd) camera, and totally useless GPS system and a very accomplished video capture and playback device.

Is the phone now... It really is a small pocket computer and more. I honestly think that the N95 is a legendary device, it introduced so many 'firsts' for Nokia and the industry as a whole.

What is your one wish... A raw photo format option and a (nearly) raw video format option - that crazy jerky frame rate is a real turn off and hasn't improved one bit since the preproduction N95!

All in all the N95 is still a worthy gadget... it's the second best phone available and I believe it will be remembered fondly in years to come!

I for one will never be selling my N95 Classic.


Yes, a raw photo mode or even very high quality jpeg compression would do wonders. With HD-video coming around the corner any moment for mobiles the save-time will surely be acceptable. But James, you do know that true RAW-video at 640x480pixels at 30fps produces slightly more than 26 MB/second? Decent compression of at least factor 4-8 would still be required. And that is mostlikely still far away on the mobile platform. Though with the N96 does have some small hardware changes, perhaps video compression has been improved too? I hope you get your hands on one.
The the preproduction N96 I tried had video capture that was worse than the N95 - but that's to be expected.

RAW video... I guess I really just meant less compressed video.
N96: Well, they should send you one when it is production ready.

The image jerks are very likely related to problems with the conversion time of some video frames becoming too high. In other words, sometimes it takes the hard+software more than 1/30th of a second to compress a single frame in the incoming video stream. The maximum frame conversion time is most likely not inverse linear with the selected compression rate. However resolution changes (at least for software implementations) would yield more or less linear lower frame conversion times (pixel count vs conversion time).

I guess a test is required to find out if the normal-quality at 640x480 is less jerky than high quality at 640x480. But I am sure the 320x240 suffers less of jerkiness. Some pun intended here ;-) Feel free to pick up the idea.

In any case the normal video mode would perhaps be more useful for shaky video recordings a la 'Cloverfield'. But for some reason, I have the camera alway set to high quality. Even if a lower resolution or quality might give better results. Mmmmm, I think I need to reevaluate my N95 video recording strategies.
[this is good]

What reasons did I have to buy this phone?
I'm obsessed with finding a perfect convergent, mobile device. The N95 was the first mobile device to have all things wrapped up into one, small package. And, I feel, it still is. I wanted a smart phone, portable PC, MP3 player, GPS navigator, video camcorder, digital camera, and mobile game consel. What other device does all this?!?

Was that phone a year ago what I wanted?
I liked it then but I was frustrated with certain performace capibilities. GPS seemed to not work very well and I constaintly got an "Out of memory" message when attempting to run several programs at once. However, I was impressed about all the basic caiblities.

Is the phone now what you wanted then?
Thanks to the firmware updates, my major issues have all been addressed! Assisted GPS works MUCH better and thanks to the new RAM management, I almost never get an out of memory message. A year later I still feel like this is the best phone on the market (for my needs).

My Over-all review of my N95-1

The N95: Jack of all trades, master of none! Still, a year later, the best mobile device on the market (for me). So far, I still see the N95 as the worlds best convergent device. Period.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in